Lorem Ispum

REACH-compliant formaldehyde testing: steps for manufacturers

From reference measurements to in-house production control – this is how you ensure that your products comply with legal limits.

The new, cross-sector formaldehyde limit values under REACH mean that, for the first time in many industries, specific testing procedures must be defined and implemented. Whilst such procedures have been established in the wood-based materials industry for years, other sectors must now reliably adapt these structures. In this section, we provide a concise overview of the necessary steps – from selecting suitable test methods to carrying out robust reference measurements. A more detailed description of the relevant test standards can be found in the Insight article [Test methods and standards for REACH-compliant formaldehyde testing].

1. Establish a baseline

REACH defines its emission limit values on the basis of measurements taken in precisely specified reference test chambers. These reference measurements form the central starting point for any REACH-compliant testing strategy. The tests are carried out in standardised test chambers and typically last between 10 and 28 days, depending on the method. EN 717-1 is used particularly frequently, although other methods such as EN 16516 may also be applied depending on the product group.

Companies have two options for carrying out these measurements:

  • Operating their own reference test chambers
  • Collaborating with accredited testing laboratories

For companies with no prior experience of such tests, working with an established laboratory is often a good starting point. The reference values determined there are legally binding and serve as the basis for all further testing and control steps.

GreCon GASANALYSER MC product against grey-white background

2. Select and correlate rapid methods

Reference test chambers provide the legally binding emission values – but are only of limited suitability for day-to-day production due to long test times and high equipment requirements. For this reason, faster, technically less complex methods are used in in-house production control.

Methods suitable for in-house production control include, for example:

  • ISO 12460-3:2023 (gas analysis method)
  • ISO 12460-2:2024 (small chamber method)

As these derived methods use different measurement conditions, their results are not directly comparable with reference tests. To be able to work with them nonetheless, the measured values from the rapid method must be correlated with the results from the corresponding reference chamber. This is usually done using around five samples per material group. The conversion relationship derived from this can then be used for regular routine tests.

Only a carefully performed correlation ensures that the rapid method reliably reflects actual compliance with the REACH limits.

Technical implementation in the laboratory

For standard-compliant in-house production control, companies require measurement systems that accurately and reproducibly reflect procedures such as ISO 12460-3:2023 or ISO 12460-2:2024. Fagus-GreCon offers tried-and-tested solutions for this purpose, specifically designed to meet the requirements of routine testing and REACH-compliant processes.

  • GASANALYSER (GA) and GASANALYSER SL (GASL)

These systems support measurements in accordance with ISO 12460-3 and are internationally recognised, including by CARB (GA and GASL) and EPA TSCA Title VI (GA). They are particularly suitable for robust, repeatable routine measurements in the in-house laboratory and thus provide a solid foundation for REACH-compliant control processes.

  • GASANALYSER MC

The GASANALYSER MC operates in accordance with ISO 12460-2:2024 (CARB-approved) and uses laser technology to determine precise emission values within approximately 15 minutes. This makes it ideal for laboratories with high sample throughput and tight testing intervals, enabling very close production monitoring.

All the systems mentioned enable reliable and reproducible quality control within the company’s own premises – both in the context of REACH and for general emission monitoring requirements.

Practical relevance for manufacturers

Systems with automated workflows and reproducible measurement technology significantly facilitate this correlation. They create a reliable data foundation on which comparative measurements can be systematically carried out and documented.

Setting up a correlation properly?

We can help! Together, we’ll define the procedure, sampling logic and documentation to ensure that routine measurements remain meaningful and REACH-compliant.

3. Establish routines

To ensure that rapid methods deliver reliable and comparable results in the long term, they require clearly defined laboratory procedures that are consistently followed. Four areas are particularly important in this regard:

  • Fixed testing intervals:

Samples should be taken from production at clearly defined intervals. This prevents long periods without measurement data and ensures that potential deviations in emission quality do not go undetected.

  • Consistent sampling:

To ensure reproducible measurement results, it is crucial to take samples from the same material locations as those used for the original correlation, where possible. As edge and core areas may exhibit different emissions, a consistent sampling strategy contributes significantly to comparability. Guidance on this is often provided directly in the relevant rapid method standards.

  • Consistent conditioning of test specimens:

Temperature, humidity and storage duration between production and testing significantly influence the measured emissions. Conditions should therefore be kept as constant as possible. In practice, it has proven effective to condition the samples 12–24 hours prior to laboratory testing – during this time, the material stabilises chemically and typically yields more stable and comparable values.

  • Periodic reference tests for validation:

To validate the laboratory routine, reference chamber tests should be carried out at regular intervals – for example, annually or whenever new products are included in the existing correlation. This is the only way to ensure the long-term reliability of the rapid method.

Inline supplement for maximum process control

Whilst laboratory instruments provide reference values, the GASANALYSER IL enables the monitoring of formaldehyde emissions directly within the production process – for example, at the extraction point of a cross-cut saw.

It does not replace standard-compliant laboratory measurement and does not have CARB/TSCA approval. Its strength lies in real-time monitoring:

  • early detection of process deviations
  • reduction of scrap
  • stabilisation of production conditions
  • prevention of limit value exceedances

In this way, inline measurement usefully complements laboratory testing and increases process reliability.

The GreCon GASANALYSER IL as a measurement method in the production line
The GreCon GASANALYSER IL as a measurement method in the production line

4. Ensure documentation is in place

Comprehensive and fully maintained documentation is a key component of REACH compliance. All data collected as part of the emissions testing must be recorded in such a way that it can be verified and traced at any time. In particular, this means that measurement results must be:

  • systematically recorded
  • stored in a traceable manner
  • and, where necessary, made available to customers or regulatory authorities.

Automated measurement systems provide significant support for these requirements: they record data in a structured manner, prevent transcription errors and increase transparency throughout the entire supply chain. This ensures that it can be demonstrated at any time that products reliably comply with the applicable emission limits.

Implementing REACH in a structured and secure manner

REACH compliance is not achieved through a single measurement, but through a systematically structured combination of reference measurements, correlated rapid methods, clear testing and production routines, and traceable documentation. It is only the interplay of these elements that provides the necessary assurance – both internally and externally.

The robust testing strategy is based on four key components:

  • A reliable reference basis
  • Correlated rapid methods
  • Stable and consistently adhered-to routines
  • Transparent, traceable documentation

Only when all components work together effectively is a reliable and permanently stable foundation established for compliance with REACH limits. The systems in the GASANALYSER family support this approach by effectively combining laboratory testing with in-line monitoring.

Please do not hesitate to contact us! Our measurement technology experts will be happy to advise you on the right testing strategy for your business.